Labels

Abubakar Siddique (1) Afganistan (2) Afghan government (1) Afghanistan (9) Africa (3) Al Jazeera English (1) Al Qaeda (1) al-Qaeda (4) Al-Qaeda Organization in the Islamic Maghreb (1) Alex Jones (1) Ali Asghar Soltanieh (1) Aljazeera (3) American Independent Party (1) Anderson Cooper (1) Arab people (1) Arab World (2) Asia (1) Asian NATO (1) Associated Press (2) Baghdad (1) Bank (1) Barack Obama (6) Ben Ali (1) Ben Wedeman (1) Benghazi (1) Benjamin Netanyahu (1) BlackBerry Messenger (1) Blog (1) Bushehr (1) Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant (1) Cairo (6) Catherine Ashton (1) CBS News (1) Central Intelligence Agency (1) CNN (6) Council of Europe (1) Day of Ashura (1) Defenders of Human Rights Center (1) Director of National Intelligence (1) Doha (1) Egypt (14) Egyptian General Intelligence Directorate (1) Egyptians (5) Elections in Iraq (1) Enriched uranium (1) Fatah (1) French people (1) Gabrielle Giffords (1) George Wallace (1) Google (1) Government (3) Government of Spain (1) Greek mythology (1) Hamid Karzai (1) Hillary Rodham Clinton (1) History (1) Hosni Mubarak (11) Human rights (1) Human Rights Watch (1) India (1) Indigenous People (1) International Atomic Energy Agency (1) International Security Assistance Force (1) Iran (12) Iranian Revolution (1) Iraq (6) Iraq War (3) Islam (1) Islamabad (2) Islamism (2) Israel (7) James R. Clapper (1) Japan (1) Japanese domestic market (1) Joe Biden (3) Kabul (2) Kabul Bank (1) Kandahar (1) Kings of Brega (1) Kuwait (1) Lahore (1) Law Society (1) Lebenon (1) Libya (1) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (2) Mediterranean Sea (1) middle east (14) Military (2) Mitsubishi (1) Mohamed Ghannouchi (1) Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (1) Monzer al-Kassar (1) Muammar al-Gaddafi (1) Mubarak (1) Murder (1) Muslim (1) Muslim Brotherhood (2) National Defense University (1) National security (1) New York Times (3) Nicolas Sarkozy (1) Nissan (1) Nissan Motors (1) Noam Chomsky (1) Nobel Peace Prize (1) Non-governmental organization (1) Nuclear (1) Nuclear power (1) Nuclear program of Iran (3) Obama (1) Oil (1) Omar Suleiman (3) Omar Zakhilwal (1) Osama Bin Laden (2) Pakistan (10) Parliament (1) Poker (1) Police (1) Politician (1) President (1) President of Afghanistan (1) President of Egypt (1) Prime Ministers (1) Protest (4) Provisional government (1) Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (1) Saeed Jalili (1) Salam Fayyad (1) Saleh Muhamed al-Mutlaq (1) Saudi Arabia (1) Shia Islam (1) Shirin Ebadi (1) Social Sciences (1) Spain (1) Sport utility vehicle (1) Steve Watson (1) Stuxnet (1) Suez Canal (1) Suicide attack (1) Taliban (6) tea party (1) Tehran (3) Thailand (1) The Guardian (1) The Washington Post (1) Tony Blair (1) Tucson Arizona (1) Tunisia (4) Twitter (1) United Nations (3) United States (22) United States Air Force (2) United States armed forces (2) United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (1) United States Intelligence Community (1) United States Navy SEALs (1) Unmanned aerial vehicle (1) Video camera (1) War Crimes (1) War on Terror (1) White House (3) Wikileaks (1) Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (2)

Video Report from Afghanistan: How the U.S. Counterinsurgency Campaign Is Failing

Bn

At a conference in Portugal over the weekend, NATO countries agreed to hand over responsibility for Afghanistan’s security to Afghan forces by the end of 2014. In his speech, President Obama claimed there has been significant progress in the fight against the Taliban. But reports from the ground in Afghanistan question these upbeat claims about the ongoing NATO operation. Last spring, NATO launched a major operation in the Taliban-held town of Marjah. The offensive was supposed to showcase America’s new counterinsurgency campaign and demonstrate that victory is still possible. Independent filmmaker Rick Rowley of Big Noise Films recently traveled to Marjah and discovered the counterinsurgency campaign in crisis. [includes rush transcript]

CNN.com - WORLD/Middle East

Middle East : a NewsXS service feed

JPost.com - Middle East News

BBC News - Middle East

JPost.com - Israel News

Afghanistan News

Iraq News

Israel and Palestine

Total Pageviews

Delicious

Search This Blog

Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label Nuclear program of Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nuclear program of Iran. Show all posts

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Iran nuclear plant suffers setback - Middle East - Al Jazeera English

Image representing New York Times as depicted ...Image via CrunchBase


Iran nuclear plant suffers setback
Tehran announces plans to remove fuel from Bushehr reactor while it carries out "technical work".
Last Modified: 26 Feb 2011 14:54 GMT
Iran's Bushehr plant has seen a number of setbacks in its more than three decade-long history [AFP]
Iran has said it will remove fuel rods from its Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power plant, a move that is being seen as a major setback to the country's nuclear programme.
The decision, announced on Saturday, comes just months before the facility, which is located in the southern city of Bushehr, was scheduled to go into operation to generate electricity.
"Based on the recommendation of Russia, which is in charge of completing the Bushehr atomic power plant, the fuel inside the reactor core will be taken out for a while to conduct some experiments and technical work," Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said.
"After the experiments, it will again be installed in the core of the reactor," he said in comments to the ISNA news agency, but he did not specify when the experiments would be completed.
Iran has given no reason for the unexpected fuel unloading, but there has been speculation that it could be connected with the Stuxnet computer worm that infected Iranian industrial software and facilities last year. in January, The New York Times reported that the computer worm was created by US and Israeli intelligence services to sabotage Iran's nuclear ambitions.
'Game over?'
While Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for purely civilian purposes, the West accuses it of using it as cover for building weapons,
Iran has previously admitted that the Stuxnet worm infected the Bushehr reactor, although Nasser Rastkhah, the head of Iran's nuclear safety system, said that the worm had "no effect on the controls of the Bushehr atomic plant".
But Ghanbar Naderi, a journalist with the state-run Iran Daily newspaper, warned the Stuxnet worm could cause a nuclear disaster.
"This is about a dangerous move by the West - I'm talking about the United States and Israel [which are] trying to sabotage Iran's nuclear programme and the launch of its first nuclear power plant," he said, speaking to Al Jazeera from Tehran.
"Remember, the Stuxnet computer worm has a code that can help control the nuclear power plants operations remotely.
"If it falls into the hands of someone who doesn't like success or achievement in our nuclear programme it could trigger a nuclear disaster similar to the one in Chernobyl."
Western analysts have speculated on how damaging the fuel removal could be for Iran's nuclear programme.
The New York Times quoted David A Lochbaum, a nuclear engineer at the Union of Concerned Scientists, as saying: "It could be simple and embarrassing all the way to 'game over'."
But he also noted that unloading a newly fueled reactor was "not unprecedented".
The Bushehr plant has suffered a series of setbacks in its more than three decade-long history, but was finally "launched" by Moscow in August last year and was due to begin generating electricity in April.
Uranium search
Separately, the Associated Press news agency reported an intelligence report "from an IAEA member country" as saying that Iran is expanding a covert global search for raw uranium.
It recorded a secret visit by Akbar Salehi, Iran's foreign minister, in January to uranium-rich Zimbabwe in a search for the metal.
A confidential report by the UN's nuclear watchdog said that Tehran continues to stonewall its attempts to follow up on the information.
The IAEA report also said that conversion work of uranium ore to the gas from which enriched uranium is made remained idle for the 18th month, indicating a possible shortage of the raw material on which Tehran's nuclear programme is built on.
Iran denies any uranium shortage, but the intelligence assessment is line with international assessments that Iran's domestic supplies cannot indefinitely sustain an expanding nuclear programme.
Tehran is under four sets of UN sanctions for its refusal to stop uranium enrichment, which can create both nuclear fuel and fissile warhead material.
Iran nuclear plant suffers setback - Middle East - Al Jazeera English
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Iran Nuclear Talks Collapse With No Progress - NYTimes.com

President of Iran @ Columbia University.Image via WikipediaIran Nuclear Talks Collapse With No Progress - NYTimes.com

Iran Nuclear Talks Collapse With Lack of Progress



ISTANBUL — Two days of talks between Iran and six world powers ended in failure Saturday, with Iran refusing to engage here on any concrete proposals to build confidence that its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes and with no date set for another meeting.

Related

Western officials expressed disappointment, but not surprise. And they reiterated that their proposals, including a deal under which Iran would ship out enriched uranium in return for nuclear fuel, were still in effect should Iran choose to open talks without preconditions.
The head of the delegation of the six, Catherine Ashton, the European Union foreign policy chief, said: "Our proposals remain on the table. Our door remains open. Our telephone lines remain open."
But with no new talks scheduled, the Obama adminstration will now face new pressures to ramp up another round of sanctions against Iran.
The opening day of the talks, on Friday, was acrimonious, with a late-night plenary session becoming tense and irritable before an agreement to meet again on Saturday, senior Western diplomats said.
Iran refused to discuss specifics and continues to assert that it is in full compliance with nuclear agency inspectors, while insisting on its right to enrich uranium no matter what the United Nations Security Council demands.
“The Iranians still will not admit that they have a problem with the world,” one diplomat said late Friday night. “Every idea we put forward they find a reason not to take it up.” He said that the talks came very close to ending Friday night, but the parties agreed in the end to continue them on Saturday morning.
The six powers — the United States and the other four members of the United Nations Security Council, plus Germany — had asked for the extra session in order to shape a framework for further talks and confidence-building measures, the diplomats said. They emphasized that the six would not agree to any preconditions.
After a two-hour opening plenary session on Friday morning largely given over to summarizing known positions, the talks broke at about noon for Friday prayers and lunch, and did not resume again until 4 p.m. Then, a bilateral meeting between the Iranian chief negotiator, Saeed Jalili, and the representative of the world powers, Catherine Ashton, the European Union foreign policy chief, convened for 90 minutes.
But Western diplomats expressed disappointment with the results of the meeting. They said that Ms. Ashton laid out an agreed position on how to move forward, with a revised fuel swap deal for Iran’s already enriched uranium and a series of bilateral meetings, including one with the United States. But Mr. Jalili said that first there must be recognition of Iran’s right to enrich uranium and a lifting of “measures” — understood as sanctions — that would “would jeopardize Iran’s rights and obligations” under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
The diplomats said that Iran’s right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes was a given, and that the sanctions had been imposed by the United Nations Security Council after Iran failed to deal honestly and completely with the International Atomic Energy Agency. They said they wanted to move into detailed discussions with Iran of a modified fuel swap deal, first laid out in October 2009, designed to remove enough enriched uranium to prevent Iran from building a bomb in return for fuel rods for a small Tehran reactor making medical isotopes.
The point of this Istanbul meeting has been “to find out if Iran is serious” about negotiating, a senior Western diplomat said. There is still no clear answer to that question, but American and French officials in particular have said in the last few days that “talking cannot be an endless process,” even as they have expressed relief that Iran is having difficulties with its centrifuges and the estimated time for it to be nuclear-bomb capable has been extended.
While Mr. Jalili has had other bilateral meetings with the Russians and the Turks, who are supposed to be simply hosting the talks, he has not yet taken up an open invitation for a separate meeting with the United States delegation and its leader, William J. Burns, the under secretary of state for political affairs. The last formal bilateral meeting between the two was in October 2009.
In the bilateral with Mr. Jalili, Ms. Ashton “put forward where we would like to go in the process in a positive fashion,” a Western diplomat said. “We want to push it forward on the basis of no preconditions.” But so far, he said, there has been no discussion of the details of any modified fuel swap or any agreement on a framework for further negotiations. He called the results of the meeting “inconclusive.”
The goal of the six is to get Iran to suspend enrichment entirely, at least for the period of serious negotiations; all these talks are trying to do is to create enough mutual trust to shape a process, including confidence-building measures like the fuel swap, to enable more serious talks to take place on an agreed agenda. The six are also offering a set of economic and technical aid programs if Iran agrees to stop enrichment.
Iran insists its nuclear program is only for civilian energy; most of the rest of the world believes that the program is military.
Tehran is under four sets of Security Council sanctions for refusing to cease enrichment and other activities that could be used to make nuclear weapons, and has regularly kept its enrichment activities secret from the International Atomic Energy Agency, which says it still has serious questions Iran will not answer.
But Iran came to the table warning that it would never stop enrichment. “Resolutions, sanctions, threats, computer virus nor even a military attack will stop uranium enrichment in Iran,” Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran’s ambassador to the nuclear agency, told Iranian state television.
Iran has regularly wanted to discuss a larger agenda at these talks, including global nuclear disarmament, Israel, and the American military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The talks in Istanbul are scheduled to continue on Saturday. They are the second round of talks between Iran and the six after negotiations resumed last month in Geneva, breaking a 14-month hiatus.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Iran confirms inviting world powers to visit nuclear sites - Jerusalem Post

Member countries of the IAEAImage via WikipediaIran confirms inviting world powers to visit nuclear sites - Jerusalem Post: "

CBC.ca


Iran confirms inviting world powers to visit nuclear sites
Jerusalem Post
By AP AND JPOST.COM STAFF Teheran invites EU, non-aligned movement and representatives from 5+1 countries in a gesture of "good will" regarding nuclear program; US says move is "a clever ploy," but not a substitute for responsibilities to IAEA. ...
Iran Invites Inspections of Atomic Sites Before TalksBusinessWeek
Iran invites international inspectors to visit its nuclear sitesRIA Novosti
Iran says ambassadors nuclear visit on Jan 15-16Reuters
Bloomberg -New York Times -RTT News
all 824 news articles »
"
Enhanced by Zemanta